PROTON

PROTON

.

I think that I have finally crunched the structure of a proton and neutron on Sunday, March 26, 2000. Here is a description of what comes out of it.

Take a ping pong ball and draw a tetrahedron on it in a black pen. Join every three neighboring intersections with a circle. Two of them in red and two of them in blue. This should give you four black edges (lines) straddled by red and blue lines, one black edge straddled by 2 red and one black edge straddled by 2 blue. What you are looking at is so far a gross diagram of quark structure of a basic "nucleon", where black represents quark pair axis around which the red quark and the blue anti quark are drawn. The red-black-blue represents neutral quark pairs. The red-black-red represent double positive quark pair and the blue-black-blue represents double negative anti quark pair.
The red blue are further twisted like a twine into a double helix vortex, while the double blue and the double red are single helixes next to each other. The quarks are actually 1/3s of a photon loop and they are a magnetic order and portion of material structure. The spin number represents the portion or compound of photon loops. The photons are crests of a multistrand helical wave closed upon itself into a circle. 1/3 spin represents 1/3 of a photon loop.

El. force field of each quark looks like magnetic field of a conductor under DC, but their deformities due to the geometric arrangement of the "blue&red" quark shapes the el. fields into more or less spherical shape. The el. force fields are the communicative medium between quark pairs as well as between photon loops, balancing their momentary disparities induced by thermal energy oscillation of quarks between their points of limitation at their mutual intersections. The el. force fields are the thinner portion of the denser magnetic of quark strings. Each blue-red communicates across and around their black axis, but the red-black-red (double positive) and blue-black-blue (double negative) communication field has to half circumnavigate the "ball" and also pass through the ball, in order to communicate closing the loops. Therefore, this el. force field creates an envelope around the rest of the nucleon structurally similar to the magnetic field of earth as represented by the lines of force. Therefore, the field is more or less a doughnut like structure around and through the "nucleon" and a vortex again.
This geometrical arrangement actually represents proton, or better said electrically strongly active bipolar nucleon. It has general electrical polarity, and it has magnetic momentum due to the blue-red helix symmetry (handedness). That one decides its orientation in a general magnetic field.
When two such nucleons are brought into proximity, they will flip if needed and attach by their double negative to double positive el. force poles, because that is the strongest attractive el. force field arrangement. But, the system becomes electrically weaker to the outside as a whole compared to a single tetrahedral nucleon, as the el. force field becomes partially tied (shifted) toward the joint, which can be seen as the new center of the system. This very shift also deforms the tetrahedrons into a half of octahedron (pyramid). When the magnetic quarks also permeate, which I am not sure the el. field will cause on its own, but most likely it does, you may realize that the double positive quarks (magnetic structure) became balanced by double negatives around the now common black axis straddling quark-antiquark semicircles, that the black axis straightened and that the quark and anti quark semi circles mutually protrude into the nucleons.
The joint becomes magnetic "nodal" joint, which can be called strong force bond. This would be the second strongest and probably most common nuclear bond, as there are two quark and two anti quark pairs protruding mutually into the nucleons and at the same time tied together by the common el. force general communication field. Yet, there is a remanent electric repulsivity between the original doubles.
As double positive and double negative coupling sides of two such nucleons approach they attract the two nucleons, but also the quarks themselves the more, the closer they are. But, once the magnetic coupling progresses beyond the point of contact of the magnetic nodes of quarks and anti quarks, the situation reverses and the quark to quark el. force begins to oppose the magnetic coupling, although itself still in an attractive mode, and we have the weak force.
There is probably also a mixed quark coupling in more complex structures of nucleuses, where red-blue joins with blue-red, when the double N&P quarks are already occupied. This would balance into a cross, therefore this bond should be as strong magnetically as the first one, but really opposed by the quark to quark el. force communication. But, it should be fairly uncommon in simple nucleuses, because the doubles P&P and N&N attract much more strongly before coupling than the mixed quark pairs.
There is also a possibility of a particle structured as a 4 sided pyramid, composed from 5 photon rings, which would have no double positive and double negative pairs. But then we would have 8-quark-antiquark pair nucleon with electric momentum, but not a real single axis polarity. This stands for neutron. (S.D.K. 21.04.2001. This is wrong. See TTF2 - NEUTRON.)
As a nuclear cluster grows, it becomes electrically weaker and weaker, as the el. force general field shifts (concentrates) more and more toward the common center of the cluster. This explains why fission works on heavy elements, while fusion works on light elements. This is one of the causes of nuclear stability and instability. It also explains radioactivity and its half times. Radioactivity is caused by geometrical asymmetry of the cluster bonding due to its geometric possibilities and impossibilities, therefore instability of the nucleus in larger structures where bonding cannot be achieved where quark pairs do not match. Wave fluctuations and resonance(s) through out the bulk of material is an important factor to be taken into consideration. The smaller the material cluster, the more stable it is not only as a nuclear structure, but also as a "stone".
When a nucleon leaves any nuclear cluster within the bulk, the whole bulk becomes electrically stronger within. The geometry also explains why fission needs slow neutrons. The fast ones do not have enough contact time with a target nucleus for that nucleus to realign and shift el. force energies of the immediate el. force field structure. But when that time is allowed, the center of the cluster shifts and other parts of the target nucleus suffer imbalance and the whole cluster may split apart. Fission is not a direct result of kinetic energy breaking the target, although the impact and its resonance(s) help to destabilize the el. force relations of the quark-antiquark field communication of the target nucleus as well as the magnetic portion. The magnetic and the electric are an integral one with a great degree of flexibility (time delay).
Open and closed valence bonds are what turns the protons and possibly neutrons either into fairly electrically neutral particles, or into ions. That depends on closed and open valence bonds, (again quark photonic structures) but it is quite another part of the phenomenon called massive matter.
Counting photons per "neutron" as many people attempt does not lead anywhere. The simple reason is, that one photon will happily absorb another photon becoming one photon with the combined energy of the two original ones (this is valid only for photons tied into massive material structure.) It is very similar to a valence bond (currently misnomered as electron) absorbing a photon, without that bond becoming two bonds. The valence quantum jump is no jump in an orbit radius, but in the frequency of a complete valence bond. Actually the nuclear quark in an atom does not absorb and radiate photons directly, only a valence bond can do that. Temperature as measured by a thermometer belongs to valence bond only. Temperature of a nucleus is incomparably higher than that in its adjoining valence bonds. (This, when elaborated upon, explains thermal resistivity and the relation of tension and current when frequencial harmonics of arrays are considered.)
The 1/2 spin of electron as a valence bond spells that the valence bond itself is a photon (spin1) loop, and that valence "electron" is a half of a photon loop, i.e. 1/2 spin quark Electrons as such do not exist in material matter. They are strictly emitted particles, same as positrons. The particle identification as so far understood by orthodoxy is incorrect. The ionic electron or positron are partially tied into the nuclear structure and that part which is tied can be perceived as a part of the nucleus with its quark and anti quark loops sticking out of the nucleus open to chemical photon bonding.

Notes

• I have a suspicion that if a model of the proton were to be built form copper (quark) and aluminum (anti quark) wires, we would probably get an ultimate orgone collector creating its own antigravity field, as long as its helixes and their frequencies were done according to the rules of harmonics, i.e. correct math relations. QM quark frequency numbers would be most likely the best guidance. The coils of the quark pairs would be more like caduceous coils in their structuring than strictly helical ones.

• This write-up has been published twice as a discussion subject on Deja, but I have updated it trying to make it more understandable at each posting, including this version. So far no one has commented upon it.