domingo, 13 de julio de 2014

MALTESE CART TRACKS

CART TRACKS
OF MALTA
.
A lot has been said about the enigmatic cart tracks of Malta Island and a lot had been speculated on their depths, widths and origin. So far no one seems to have been able to look at the problem of the track dimensions and shape diversity from the point of view of geomorphology of the development of karst surfaces on limestone bedrock.
Lets start with the chemistry of the limestone (this is also applicable to dolomites).
Karst fields and cave sinter are interrelated in their development by the simple chemical process, where calcium carbonate of the surface and subsurface limestone is dissolved by carbon dioxide (CO2) contained in the penetrating water. Rainwater picks CO2 up from the air as it develops in the clouds and as it falls to the ground. The weak carbonated water (carbonic acid) dissolves the limestone (calcium carbonate) and penetrates the limestone porosity, cracks etc. down into the interior of the limestone massive. It eventually exits the limestone as seepage or an underground creek. Wherever this weak carbonic acid solution of calcium carbonate exits the limestone, it looses its carbon dioxide content to the open air. The carbon dioxide content in the underground water may also be lost to other minerals contained within the limestone where either oxidation or carbonation or both of other minerals may take place.
As the carbon dioxide exits the water, the originally dissolved calcium carbonate crystallizes out of the solution and is left behind as sinter, whose most generally known form are the stalactites and stalagmites in caves.
There is also a secondary process in the surface or subsurface rainwater collected in the puddles and the soil moisture on the surface of the limestone bedrock. As long as the bedrock is covered by soil, which supports organic growth, the surface water is enriched by carbon dioxide produced by natural decay of plant and animal remains. In simple terms, as the plant and animal life decays in the top soil, the bacteria causing such decay release carbon dioxide into the soil, which is consequently dissolved into the surface water contained in the soil as well as sitting on top of the soil in form of puddles and which consequently etches the surface of the karst forming bedrock (limestone and dolomites).
When the bedrock is covered by a heavy cover of soil, the process of bedrock surface deterioration eventually creates, given the time, very deep and wide irregular indentations, which can reach depths of tenths of meters, but which create more less uniform mélange pattern of indentations on the large scale of the field.
On the other hand, where the soil cover of the karst forming bedrock is relatively thin, the topsoil eventually collects in these indentations as they deepen and as rainwater washes the soil into them, but do not grow in width all that much. But what has to be accounted for is also the topology of the karst bedrock. Any sloping of the bedrock causes the thin layer of top soil to be washed not only into the karst indentation, but also washing of the topsoil into the lower areas of the bedrock surface. This causes collection of the topsoil in the lower elevations of the bedrock leaving the higher areas exposed. Once the limestone looses its topsoil cover all together, the whole surface becomes subject to weathering while the karsting process stops producing any more indentations of an appreciable degree.
The problem with the Malta cart track irregularities is fairly easily solved once this karsting process is taken into consideration. I am not going to enter into speculations of the initial track origin and purposes, but it seems quite obvious that the karsting process had its hand in the development of these tracks as they can be seen today.
Once a cart has run over the topsoil above the bedrock, especially when the soil was moist, we can expect creation of soil ruts above the bedrock. These ruts will first of all collect the water from the surrounding soil as well as organic debris and they will also retain the water longer, because their soil had been compacted. This gives the water and the organic decay produced carbon dioxide in the ruts an appreciably longer period of time to work chemically on the karst bedrock than the water in the soil next to it, before the moisture soaks in and evaporates after a rainfall. As the tracks are now being etched into the bedrock surface, the topsoil starts collecting in these stone tracks and the bedrock becomes exposed next to such tracks. This more or less causes that the karsting continues within the tracks only, where there is some soil trapped in the track, leaving the rest of the bedrock next to the tracks exposed to weathering.
The speed of karsting depends on many local factors over the time of its development. The few of them I know about are:
  • Content of carbon dioxide in air
  • General temperatures at the latitude and elevation.
  • Annual rate of rainfall
  • Rate of daily airborne condensation due to daily temperature variation
  • Degree of vegetation and life as such in the locality
  • Depth of the top soil
  • Chemical and structural composition of the bedrock
When it comes to cart track initiated karsting, there are also further factors to be taken into the account. One of them is the frequency of use of the “road”. A heavily used track can be expected to be deeper than a lightly used one. A deeper track in the overlaying topsoil can be expected to collect organic debris and rainwater more than a shallow one and therefore the karsting process under and around the deeper soil track can be expected to progress at a faster rate than under and around a shallow track, due to the different rate of organic decay and a period of retention of moisture.
When the topsoil from the bedrock is washed away, except in its deep indentations, it can be expected that the karsting process will continue only inside such indentations, while the rest of the karst field is exposed to weathering. This means that if the initial cart track has been indented into a shallow layer of top soil, where only the bottom of the track is covered by soil, its karsting can be expected to be narrow, even though deep. When the topsoil layer was initially thicker, the karsting can be expected to grow wide and deep.
This is somewhat complicated by the accuracy of vehicles repeatedly passing over a single track. I would be inclined to state that the really narrow tracks represent single vehicle pas over a quite shallow topsoil, while the wider tracks represent single, or multiple passes over a relatively thick topsoil layer. In my opinion, the haphazard tangle of these tracks on Malta Island does not support a view that they represent any particular roads.
The fact that the Malta tracks often lead from nowhere to nowhere can be possibly explained by patchiness of the topsoil cover at the times of the track creation. A vehicle running over exposed rock may have and probably did some abrasive damage to the bedrock surface, but it would not initiate the karsting process in the bedrock. Therefore, the tracks should be generally found only in the shallow depressions of the bedrock surface, while being virtually non-existent on the bedrock humps.
Reading through Mr. Graham Hancock “Underworld”, he has noticed a jagged ridge of limestone between the “wheel marks” of the same track. Such a ridge points to the karsting process of development of the tracks quite explicitly.
Since karsting is a time dependent process, it can be to a degree used for establishment of an approximate age of the tracks in their relation to other objects on the locality. This would have to be taken up with a geologist in conjunction with archeologists.
If, for example, a megalithic building dated at 3000BC is standing on top of cart track 0.5m deep, and the karsting process at that locality is estimated at 0.1mm/year, the track is obviously about 5000 years older than the megalithic building and therefore dates at least 8000BC.
When quite different depths but consistent widths tracks are found in the same general locality, with generally the same type of bedrock, it points in the direction of very long use of the locality by some kind of vehicles taking eventually different routes.
When we find such cart tracks under the sea, we have to understand that the karsting process has stopped at the time these tracks were flooded. If any of the submerged tracks should be at least as deep as the tracks found on the dry land in the same general locality, it is obvious that they are at least as old as the period of time past since the flooding, plus the duration of their development. In other words, if lets say 500mm deep track sunk, or was flooded 5000 years ago and the best guess on the karst indentation development speed is again 0.1mm/year, these tracks are some 10 000 years old.
The links below show some of these tracks. The Czech site has actually very good pictures of different tracks.
Disclaimer:
All numbers used above are hypothetical and are not to be taken as representative to the actual Malta situation. I am not an expert. I am just a fellow, who done some cave exploring in his time and who has learned and observed a few things while doing so.

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario