ORGOMETER

ORGOMETER

.

This is a suggestion for a construction of a device for relative quantitative measurement of the intensity and direction of orgone field.

It could be applied for relative measurement in the vicinity of Joe’s cells, cloudbusters, gravitational vortex anomalies, psychic interactions.

It is partly based on information released by Wilbert B. Smith, partly on my own researches into the qualitative workings of subtle energies and behaviour of molecular structures of materials. The orgometer utilizes directional difference in tensile strength of materials immersed in "non homogenous" gravitational field.

Any excess geometry of direction of orgone field such as the suspected thoroid around Joe Cell or the orgone beam between the cell blind plug and the engine block reinforces the tensile strength of materials parallel to prevalent lines of force of orgone field. Orgometer will display contraction in that part of the filament, which is held parallel to the lines of orgone energy exchjange. In case of the blind plug to engine block, the filament parallel to plug-block axis will contract as opposed to the orthogonal part of the filament. This translates into motion of the arm B (fig 1) relative to the arm A. In yet other words, a rather sensitive instrument based on this principle can map the "curvature of space".

The diagram represents an arrangement of arm A and B. The arrangement retains a metallic or other material filament in orthogonal direction. Arm B is rotationally movable relative to the arm A and its movement is translated onto a gauge by means of a mechanical gear of the type usually used in manometer gauges. The contraction will be slight, but will act with a relatively large force, comparable to force exerted by thermal expansion and contraction. Therefore, such a geared mechanism should be reasonable.

This gauge will give no other reading than relative length of filament contraction, therefore it will need some kind of standard to be developed for the unit of orgone field prevalent strength in a particular direction.

Any ferromagnetic element or alloy should by avoided in the construction of the instrument body due to the capability of such materials to organize orgone (electric exchange, gravitational field, aether) into magnetic lines of force structures. On the other hand, fillament made from steel might be reasonable. It has to be tested. Dielectric filament materials like nylon are claimed by Wilbert Smith to react to the directions and relative effect of orgone structure rather well.

You can refer to: http://www.cseti.org/position/addition/wilbert_smith.htm

Fig. 1

The square arrangement of the arms (body and roller in case of Fig 2) had been used in order to avoid reading of temperature changes and possibly relative humidity and other such factors. These will act on both sides of arm B and will yield no motion of arm B relative to arm A (body), therefore no reading.
I would suggest use of glass for the body. Glass can be water cut, which would help with the cost. Arm B should be substantially shortened and actually turned into a small roller as opposed to Fig1 arm, in order to increase readout sensitivity, because its tilt angle will increase with decreased length. A needle form a needle bearing (U joints have them) with a long pointer (well, even a piece of bent wire would do, but wear, for the roler and the pointer). A sensitive enough dial could be mounted or etched directly on the body. The roler race should be slightly curved in order to help keep the roller axis square to the body.
This would be the simplest, cheapest and the most dependable way to execute this meter.

Fig. 2