COMPOSITION OF FIELDS PART 2

COMPOSITION
OF FIELDS

PART 2

.

It should be noted that this part deals with steady and variable magnetic field of non alternating polarity only. It does not include alternating fields and it does not include the wave of alternating field polarity reversals. When it says frequency of a wave, it means a frequency of a wave of a photon string TTF2 - WAVE 1 in case of magnetic field, or a wave of whatever is electric field composed from.
It should be also noted that the discussion deals with idealized (single domain) magnets. The domains are only a higher ordering of magnetic arrays. The question of creation and mechanical dependencies of magnetic domains has been discussed in my original Tour the Force TTF and possibly will be discussed further in another TTF2 document in the future.
As pointed out in TTF, the lines of force are lines only because the experimentation with them shows a cross section through the field. When the polar axis cross section and its orthogonal cross section are combined, the result are shells of flux.
I have also pointed out in TTF that the travel of lines of force around a conductor, in which we progressively change the value of direct current (DC), can be only interpreted as changing the quality of the shells of magnetic flux. If the magnetic field is really composed of photons as we are taught, we have to conclude that the frequency of photons of the magnetic field changes with the value of electrical current passing through the wire. When we perform this experimenting, we can observe that while the lines of force contract around the conductor with increasing value of DC, the quantity of lines of force, the magnetic flux shells, also increases. This leads to an unavoidable conclusion that a stronger field consists of more shells of magnetic flux than a weaker field and that the quantitative property of each shell (frequency of its photons) also changes.
Then it follows that the closer the shell is to the conductor, the higher is its energy content. This implies that while inner shells around a permanent magnet are the most energetic ones, the most energetic shells within the permanent are the outermost ones.
The question is, how to unify the images of lines of force around a permanent magnet and around a conductor under DC. While the lines of force terminate at magnetic poles of a permanent magnet, they do not terminate anywhere in the conductor under DC. Yet, the magnetic flux arrays indicate that dipole magnetic field is tied to its source. I have found only one possible way in which the concentric shells of magnetic field around a conductor under DC can be tied to the conductor.
When we consider that steady DC does not produce any EM radiation and that it does not produce induction in another conductor, we can conclude that no portion of the EM field around DC conductor is leaving the system. So, we can conclude that while the field of a permanent magnet has magnetic flux oriented into a loop path through the magnet poles, it has an electric part, which has loop paths surrounding the polar axis of the permanent magnet. On the other hand, the DC conductor has electric portion of EM tied into the conductor, while its magnetic portion of EM creates circular shells concentric to the conductor within the system of electric paths.
When we try to unify the structuring of a DC conductor and a permanent magnet, we have to decide, which one of the E and M portion of a magnetic field is primary and which one is secondary.
One of the indications of the sequence is the fact that conductor under most thermal conditions can lead static charge as tension (Voltage) potential, without induction or contamination of this process by electric current within the conductor. On the other hand, electric current cannot be conducted without the presence of electric tension. Then the independent one should be considered to be the primary phenomenon.
Next indication is the fact that while electrically excited bodies may exist as monopoles, the magnetically induced bodies exist only as dipoles. This indicates that magnetic field is a property of two charge polarities combined, which indicates that electric portion of EM is the primary one from which arises the secondary magnetic field effect.
The magnetic field of a conductor under DC can then be understood in two ways.
The first one is, that there are magnetic paths (strings) within the flux, which again describe loops which pass through the conductor, as if it were a magnetic pole array. Then the lines of force around the conductor would represent mean value of frequency at the line of force distance from the conductor. This proposition faces a problem though. When we look at a permanent magnet, it is obvious that permanent magnet is not such an (alternate) array of magnetic components, just the contrary. Yet, the permanent magnet has lines of force which intermingle with lines of force of a conductor under DC.
The second way is that the body of a permanent magnet, as well as the body of a conductor under DC are a multiple electrical force source array, an array of electric charge dipoles. In that case, the electrical array of permanent magnet dipoles is either organized as strips parallel to the magnetic polar axis (unlikely), or the electric filed alone is organized so, that it follows pattern of outer semicircles whose plains are orthogonal to magnetic polar axis. Then the electric field around a conductor under DC consists of electric dipole array again, but this time the field is organized in planes parallel to the conductor axis with the slight possibility of the electric dipole array being organized in alternate planes orthogonal to conductor axis.
The spatial organization of the field components is going to be further discussed with wave of light spatial structuring. As an indication, the wave of photon as deduced in TTF and in my nucleon quark string TTF2 - NUCLEON 1 suggests that the actual paths of magnetic as well as electric field strings are helical and that the mutual orientations of magnetic flux component paths and the electric "flux" component paths are orthogonal in yet different meaning than so far used.
Component path would be a line joining any two single electric or magnetic dipoles on quantum level. Flux and, or field is considered to consist of a multitude of such paths.