NEUTRON

NEUTRON

.

A five loop pyramidal structure would compound into quark sets as per fig 1. The double positive quark pairs are a symmetrical impossibility. The structure lacks any opposing double negative quark pairs. This would make the particle subject to a great distortion separating the two double positive quark pairs and stretching the structure. The only possible solution to this problem is an octahedral arrangement, which would have to be a composition of two pyramid structures joined at their bases. One would have to be generally positive, meaning it would have to have 2 double positive quarks and the other would have to be negative, meaning it would have to have 2 double negative quarks.

fig. 1

But, this would insert extra quarks into the already occupied 4 edges of the “base”. Therefore, such a structure is again an impossibility. Next option is a straightforward octahedral structure fig 2.

fig. 2

Its unilateral triangular planes would be subject to symmetric distortion, because the quarks and antiquarks of opposite loops meet across planes in alike polarity relationship. This stretches the theoretical unilateral triangle sided octahedron base equally in its plane. The angle of the side pyramid edges relative to the base plane will slightly close. The angle of the triangular planes will be out of 3 x 60 deg. relationship and the octahedron will flatten to a degree.

The degree of angular distortion of crystalline structure of hydrogen atom can be mathematically back related to the force, with which the opposing fields of alike quarks across the triangular planes repulse each other. This is when the octahedral structure is in thermal state. There is no distortion when the structure is in complete el. current state. When the atom is in near el. current state, it may be prone to disintegration into light and some emitted electrons.

The ratio of quark to loop to particle segment remains the same as in the nucleon #1, the proton. Here we have a set of 2 x 4 = 8 photon loops, which tie into 12 quark – antiquark pairs. There are three spin segments per photon loop and each quark pair has again 1/3 spin number.

The idea that a hydrogen atom consists of a proton, a neutron and an electron is unsupportable. The hydrogen atom is actually a neutron, which may and may not support electrically neutral valence bond, open or closed. Normally, two such octahedrons joined at their apexes by a neutral valence bond would make a diatomic molecule. Without any other valence bond on the structure, we would have one electron per two octahedrons (or as presented by the orthodoxy one electron of a valence bond per two proton-neutron nucleuses).

In geometrical reality of the structuring, there will have to be another open valence bond at each outer apex of a diatomic molecule. When none of these apexes is tied to any other molecules or atoms, its open valence bonds tie into a single mixed polarity electric field around the octahedral pair. The tension of the field bends the two octahedrons or neutrons into a letter V and actually tends to close into a second closed valence bond.

Single hydrogen atoms can be induced into positive, as well as negative ionization. There is no law or natural process, which could prevent this. Mono-atomic hydrogen open valence bond can be distorted in the same way an emitted electron can. The orientation of the neutron pair relative to the outside conditions (other matter) and orientation of the hydrogen atom internal polarity in the gravitational network and its vector of motion decides, whether the ion is negative or positive. Polarity of induction from outside will also decide the polarity of hydrogen atom or molecule. The apparently externally non polarized open valence bond will show an excess of either negative or positive charge. The same goes for most molecules and atoms.

The balanced, meaning neutral charge of large conglomerate of atoms can be also expressed in the form of a dipole magnetic field, rather than a dipole charge.

This structuring is probably the key to the solution of the difference between H3 and He3 isotopes.

This solution, right or wrong, still leaves the proton structure as the smallest common denominator for nucleons. It also points out that some photon loops may have to be removed from the basic structures when these structures conglomerate into larger atoms and that the internal loop geometric relationship of nucleons may and often does change when nuclear reactions take place. Unless the structuring is developed to the order of transuraniums, there is no way to know why large structures loose some photon train loops, while disintegrating in fission.