domingo, 13 de julio de 2014

FIVES WAVES

FIVE WAVES
Notes :
  • This is a comparative speculation, which updates the previous Waves 1 - 4.
  • I have to start to distinguish between the words frequency and wavelength for clearer classification of the phenomena of flows and vibrations of flows. From now on, when I say wavelength, I will mean the spatial distance of two crests of a vortex flow spatial wave, which does not move through the arbitrary Euclidian space. It could be compared to a pitch of a multiple thread screw (unless I specifically state otherwise). When I say frequency, I will mean the time interval between two maximum densities of a generally longitudinal wave traveling through the arbitrary Euclidian space along aetheral flows, or between the crests of transverse waves traveling through the arbitrary Euclidian space along material boundaries under tension.

The First Wave
.
To start with, I will concern myself with the “fabric of space” again. Fabric of space is a wavy pattern composed from individual helical flows of material particulate, which I will traditionally call aether. Each flow creates an individual bi-directional dipole electric path of communication. All aether particulate has mutually neither strictly repulsive nor strictly attractive relationship. The near relationship is repulsive as in the behavior of two objects possessing Meisner field, and attractive at greater distances as per gravitation and/or electric field.
Its relationship is harmonic and the particulate hangs in its wavy pattern like steel filings hang around a magnet. The aether flows yield part of their relative energy to whatever has accelerated (redirected) such a flow, or a series of flows, unless it is stopped by whatever may have the capacity to stop it (next to nothing). Every flow can be redirected, curled upon itself into a loop of matter, reflected, but it cannot be stopped. Its interaction with complex matter conglomerates causes gravity.
Oh, I beg your pardon. I do not recall ever stating on these pages that kinetic energy is as relative as motion itself except that the universal standing wave pattern of the aether flows can be taken for a universal motionless reference. I better do it now.
There is no absolute value to any part of kinetic energy under a momentary and local study anywhere in the universe. There is only the infinite grand total. Every force is a result of relative exchange of relative energy. All energy values are relative.
The aether flow wave pattern has four basic parameters: wavelength (l), time (t), amplitude (a) and aether matter (m) (see below for matter). These parameters combine into the relationship of total relative energy content of any given flow (l/t)am/t related to the point of observation and the relative speed of the object of interaction, i.e. the observer or his measuring gizmo. This is always complicated by the degree of efficiency of the energy exchange under study.
Each such flow, if visible, would appear like a solid, motionless coil spring. Yet, the body of the coil would reveal, under closer scrutiny, that it is composed of a string of material particulate in helical motion, somewhat comparable in appearance to a string of our large-scale asteroids on their travel through the solar system. This is the particulate of aether itself. It can be understood more or less as asteroid, or galactic systems in their motions, but on the lower fractal level of existence.
Aether is not the smallest particulate of matter. The fractal scales of sizes and dependencies are infinite either way, micro as well as macroscopic. Looking for the beginning and the end of the universe, spatially, temporally or structurally, is a waste of time. In analogy, an arbitrary fence line may limit a property boundary of your estate, but it does not limit the landscape continuity.
The fabric of space is woven from infinite number of these flows in what would appear at first as a chaotic order of orientations and directions of aether motion along these string- like electric paths of communication. All these seemingly chaotic flows create a fairly static and stable stringy pattern, each string having a wave pattern relatively in standstill to the wavy pattern of any other string. This is valid through out the universe, through out what we call space as well through out what we call matter.
While the stringy paths themselves constantly change their relationships with motions of heavenly bodies as well as any other material motion, including subatomic particulate of the so called cosmic radiation, their mutually stable wave pattern creates the universal stationary reference, the “universal mesh”, which I have first deduced and proposed in my original Tour the Force
This pattern of the paths themselves and the directions of their flows, as geometrically chaotic as it may appear has its order, even though not all of it can possibly appear orderly in any given location in arbitrary space. It is composed form many individual patterns of individual, but interactive fields. Each of these fields belongs to some chunk of matter in the universe and each such field is again a composition of mini fields of the particulate of that chunk.
The paths permeate each other and all matter in the universe mutually communicates and interacts to some degree through its activity. If we were to begin to study a sub-field around a simple wire, inserted somewhere into the intergalactic space, we would realize that the wire superimposes its field structure over the locally chaotic universal pattern of paths. The cross section of the wire and its field’s closed paths would appear like a system of circles of rose flower petals around the center. See FIELDS 1 last diagram. The very near field of the wire (which can be indirectly observed as bending of light around the wire) is actually magnetic (see below for the explanation of electric and magnetic).
It is partially responsible for the Van der Waals force and fully for the Casimir force (Van der Waals is a composite). The field farther from the wire changes progressively into electric field, i.e. into the system of individual electric dipole paths. There is no clear distinguishing distance between what is still magnetic and what is already electric. This field, which bends the light around any wire, around any material edge, around any material body like a bearing ball, is the same field, which bends light around any planet, or a star, or a group of bodies like a galaxy. Only its scale is different.
Any polycrystalline material, lets say the rough side of sandpaper or a surface of a broken marble block has what might appear to be a very chaotic field, composed from the multitude of the individual edge fields of the individual crystals. The same goes for any fibrous material like ordinary paper, or wood, where the permeating fields around and along individual fibers appear more chaotic than the organization of the fibers themselves, due to their great complexity and layering of the flows.
A chaotic field is optically rough, meaning that light reflects from it in all kinds of directions and the surface appears flat, as opposed to glossy. Optically flat surface field is also created by materials, which may be mechanically smooth but with highly irregular positions of elements in the molecular lattice, even highly irregular molecular structure. An optically glossy field is on the other hand a result of mechanical smoothness combined with relatively regular path exchange. (another chapter)
The density of the field around a wire or an edge and its homogeneity of shape and structure decide the degree, to which it refracts (bends) light. The strongly magnetic near portion has much greater quantitative effect than the far electric portion, but they both have the same qualitative effect. This field is also subject to thermal expansion with the increase of the temperature of the material body, in our case a piece of wire, to which it belongs and which grows with the increased temperature of the material.
A rather uniform field of an edge not only bends the light, but it also bends different wavelengths of the ambient gravitational field (belonging to other material objects) with which it intermingles to such a degree, that the "noise" of the passing white light gets separated into bands of monochromatic light peculiar to the particular composition of the passing white light. It refracts the passing light into the characteristic spectrum of colors. If you still do not believe me, look into the sun through your eyelashes. The fiber micro fields can be directly observed that way. No lab.
Such a field has distinguished layers of energetic states (like onion peels) and these layers bend their harmonic counterparts of the ambient, locally parallel paths of communication. The photons following these particular ambient paths of communication are lead along the bent ambient electric and magnetic paths according to the radius of the harmonic shell (onion peel) around a wire or an edge. (See The Second Wave below)
The universal mesh wavy pattern is undetectable by any measuring devices detecting motional waves, yet it is detectable in its bulk by the observation of the phenomenon called inertia. Every object, which finds itself in a relative motion to the helical wave pattern of the electric and magnetic paths, adjusts its own wave pattern. Its own wave pattern, normally standing when the body is not in relative motion to the universal mesh pattern, always remains in a relative standstill to the universal mesh wave pattern. As soon as the body itself is forced to move relative to the universal mesh pattern, the wave of its own electric path structures begins to move relative to its bulk motion tending to remain still relative to the mesh pattern.
I can only repeat my best analogy, the behavior of a flag moving through the air. The faster is the relative speed of the flag relative to the air, the shorter is the flag wavelength and the faster the wave travels along the flag material. Yet, the wave of the flag in motion is at (almost) standstill relative to air.
But, the structure of matter is not a passive flag. Matter is again composed a wavy pattern of the fabric of space, the aetheral flows. The difference between what we may call fabric of space (or gravitational field or the universal mesh) and matter is first of all in the relative difference of density of individual paths of communication (quantity of spring helixes per volume of space).
The second one is in the relative difference in the radiuses of the path of communication. While a single aetheral path of communication of lets say the gravitational field of earth may have a radius of a few thousands kilometers, an individual aetheral path of communication of a quark has a radius in the vicinity of half a neutron diameter.
Third difference between the path of the fabric of space and a material path of communication is in the fact, that while the fabric of space path may join two material objects on whatever scale, usually along fairly straight line, and needs to be referenced by two particles of matter between which the aether flows, either both on one body, or each one on a separate body, the material path is a closed circle and is self referencing in a closed circuit, a loop. (I have to note that this is not entirely so. The material loops are only partially closed, but it will have to do for now for the sake of simplicity.)
The electric and magnetic flows are both aetheral flows. Matter is mostly magnetic phenomenon, while fabric of space, understood as gravitational field composition, is mostly an electric phenomenon.
Let me explain this one. In my vocabulary, “electric” means individual paths of aetheral flows, which are not related to other such paths by their coherence and harmony of wave pattern, as well as parallel orientation and attractive set of directions, i.e. which are not twisted together into a magnetic rope. In analogy, if a single fiber of cotton were to be a single electric path, a cotton thread would be a magnetic path. I use the word “electric”, because when these paths are reorganized and forced into polarized directions of harmonics, as lets say between electrically charged objects, we call the phenomenon “electrostatic” field, or “static” electricity.
The underlying single aetheral flows are the common component of gravitational field as well as static electricity. The difference is in the prevalence of harmonics of the spatial wavelengths of the individual paths involved and their directions. For all the practical purposes (and I will have to say a heresy of cosmic proportions here), there are no positive and negative charges. There are only complimentary and non-complimentary harmonic relations of geometric ( like 1.2.4.8.16….) sequences of wavelength values and flow directions. (another chapter) There is no antimatter. What is called antimatter is actually one complimentary side of the whole when the polarity has been divided by some means.
When I state that matter is a magnetic phenomenon, I mean that its individual electric paths are woven into magnetic ropes of quarks. See PROTON In a large-scale analogy, if we compared the upper streamers (branches) of the common lightning to the individual vortices of electric paths of communication, then the major lightning bolt (trunk) would be a magnetic path of communication, a compounded vortex wave of the electric vortices.
In my vocabulary, “magnetic” means that the individual harmonic electric paths of communication, the very fabric of space, become locally synchronized into a compounded wavy path of magnetic path. The individual helical electric path
wavelengths are flexible and stretch and shrink to some degree and adjust so, that they match and create one compound wave path and act as one synchronized flow. The quality and the quantity and the spectrum of the individual electric paths decide the quality and the total effect of the magnetic path composition.
The more of the electric paths of communication are unified by their harmonic and directional relationship and spatially synchronized into a magnetic path, the stronger is their mechanical and/or electric effect, which the paths impart to any responsive matter, lets say steel filings, or the earth, or you. The magnetic field of lets say a permanent magnet is again woven from the electric paths of the fabric of space, which themselves are roped into magnetic paths. Ferro magnets have the peculiar property of conglomerating the electric paths into magnetic paths, at least as long as long as the electric paths are in polarized directions and orientations. A concave mild steel sheet sandwiched between two super-conductive ceramics might show, whether steel would do the same with non-polarized gravitation.
A magnetic path of communication has much stronger effect than its electric components total would seem to be capable of in their individual electric state. In other words, the effect of attraction (or repulsion) is much stronger when all the electric paths of communication act while synchronized (roped) into magnetic paths, than if they all acted individually as in electrostatic field. When they act individually, their individual actions mutually interfere and the action is rather inefficient.
Second reason for much stronger effect of magnetic field is that the electric paths stack together into magnetic path and take less space. This makes up for increase of density of the electric paths per volume of space. When the helixes of aetheral flows are in the chaotic state of assorted, but not really harmonic wavelengths, they do not match each other and are not spatially synchronized either and they do not permeate when parallel. It is similar to steel coil springs with non-harmonic thread lengths. They also do not permeate (fit into each other) when in parallel orientation, while coil springs with harmonic thread lengths do permeate when in parallel orientation.
The helixes of the electric paths are not coil springs though. They have their amplitudes, or helix radius dimension and when they spatially synchronize into a magnetic flow, the smaller vortex radius paths with shorter wavelengths and smaller amplitude become imbedded within the larger radius paths, creating a composite vortex path of magnetism.
The quarks of matter are just such magnetic paths of communication. Thermal oscillation interference of materials still affects the magnetic properties of quarks and causes some of their electric paths to disengage from the magnetic bundle, giving quarks their specific electric “charges”, but that is again another chapter. While any two electric paths interact among themselves to the full extent of their potential (if harmonic and parallel etc.), they act on magnetic paths weakly, only to the maximum effect of their own (electric) potential. Only magnetic paths act on magnetic paths with the combined strength of the bundles of their electric paths.
The same “law”, which governs the change of state of an “electron” wave pattern when “electron” changes its state (jumps the “orbit”, as you may have learnt it), also governs the change of state of each individual electric and magnetic path of communication. They are both subject to a quantum leap. The change of state of any and every electric and magnetic path of communication is instant across its full length, be it an orbital segment length of quark (or like lets say Bohr’s electron “orbit” if you wish), or a more or less linear length of a magnetic path of earth field or a gravitation path across a galaxy. A path, which may join the Alpha Centaury and our sun, or the Crab Nebula with Magellan Clouds, will change its state (its spatial wavelength) along its whole length all at once (well, for whatever we may consider to be the practical purposes).
Neither the electric nor the magnetic path has a temporal dimension of frequency (unless disturbed thermally or by radio etc. transmission. (again another chapter, although TTF has explained it to a great degree). It has only the spatial dimension of wavelength and the speed of its aetheral particulate flow relative to its wave pattern. The change of the state of such a path is instantly detectable at any distance across the path length.
If you had some tissue from the astronaut, who was shot up into the earth orbit in a space shuttle and if you've kept this tissue alive on agar in the earth lab, then if the astronaut banged his head on the shuttle window while floating around, the tissue kept on agar in the earth lab would react to that bang, instantly, without the time lag of the speed of light, C. If don’t believe me, ask NASA. They have done such testing, for whatever the reason may have been.
If you would simultaneously radiate two twin photons by a single “electron”, the photons would be strung on and follow the same set of locally parallel electric paths of communication of the ambient gravitational field in opposite directions. Then if you had influenced one of the photons in some manner at some distance from the electron, let’s say reflected it, it would influence the shared set of electric paths and through that influence it would instantly change to a degree its twin photon. If you don’t believe me, ask Cern labs in Switzerland. The local experts have been trying to come to grips with this experimental result for at least a decade now. Last I heard, the distance at which the instant change of the twin photon was detected covered some 6 miles.
The wavelength state change of a path of communication is not a subject to the limitation C. The distance between the ends, if any, of a path of electric or magnetic communication does not matter. The diameter of a closed path again does not matter.
Gravitation also acts instantly, across any distance, because its force is not given by some traveling phenomenon like graviton. To put it bluntly and quite explicitly, sun has the earth on the leash of its ambient field. The earth orbit rides the harmonic shell of the sun gravitational field. There are no gravitons and no gravitational waves. Gravitation is caused by mechanical wave buckling within the preexisting network of aetheral paths of communication (another chapter). The speed of the aetheral particulate is probably infinite for all our practical purposes again, but I would not bet on it.
When I have written my WAVE GUIDES, I had these paths of communication in my mind as the waves to be guided by them. May be I should have used a term aetheral, or electric
particulate flow guides, but then I was not quite clear on how to explain such terms at the time. No point changing it now. At the same time, the geometry (direction) of the ambient flows of aether, changed by the guides, also changes the paths followed by light and the temporal waves of radio wave radiations and indeed serve as guides for these waves as well. Radio waves posses the property of frequency in time and are the traveling waves wrongly called “EM” waves. Photons of light stand apart from them, though.
I may only add, that any cavity has an internal surface field, which has the capacity to guide the ambient electric field paths as well as the magnetic paths to some degree. It modifies the geometry of space (speaking in Albert's jargon). A globular cavity actually has capacity to collect, or better said trap a portion of the ambient spectrum, to trap the flows keeping them in circulation inside the cavity, and may serve as a collector and storage of the flow energies. A tubular arrangement of the solid state gismos dug up by Russians in Siberia Russcrew have again the capacity to collect and concentrate and direct the ambient flows of aether, to whatever purpose they might have been used some 100 000 years ago as the stratification dating goes.
The Grebennikov document is actually almost specific to this effect, as it is quite explicit in its descriptions of the effects of distortions of “space” caused by arrays of organic fibrous structures as well as inorganic polycrystalline and even smooth plastic cavities and other guides.
I guess the fabric of space could be rightfully called an EM wave phenomenon, but its motion is a flow of particulate along meandering paths (relative to us), not a motion of waves within some gas-like aether, never mind motion of waves within nothing as per Albert and Michelson-Morley nonsense.
.

The Second Wave
.
The second kind of “wave” is light, except that it is not really a wave. Photons of light are generated by individual atoms of matter, or better said by valence bonds of matter (I am leaving emitted electrons out of this for simplicity). When a valence bond radiates a photon, it does not jump no orbit. The valence bond quark pair (see note) radiates photons only when it breaks up.
The bond quark pair separates off the nuclear or crystal structure, its geometry changing from circular to linear. The separated pair further separates into two its components of North and South quark and anti-quark. One of them begins to travel the electrically negative portion and the other one begins to travel the positive portion of one set of electric paths. The two travel (radiate) in exactly opposite directions. They incorporate their respective ambient electric paths harmonics into their own magnetic segment of a path adding aetheral material to the paths and energizing them.
Note:
An emitted electron is a single loop quark pair structure.
An incorporated electron, the valence bond, is a double quark pair structure, because its single loops are segmented into two at the points of retention on the nucleuses (electron is a two quark pair affair, ask Czern, that is where I got it confirmed, albeit unintentionally and unofficially) (another chapter). Actually, valence bond could have any quantity of quarks, depending on how many nuclear quark segments it shares with the nucleus.
You can refer to my SOUND and its part dealing with the tempering of steel and the physical property changes within steel during tempering. You will find that the valence bonds of steel, which join the crystals of steel together, break up with increased temperatures. When the steel becomes liquid, most of its inter-crystal bonds are gone and the liquid becomes a mess of small clusters (crystals) intermittently joined into unstable chains, same as water. The important part for light radiation is, that the inter-crystalline valence bonds intermittently break up and reestablish again.
There is no quite definite melting point to steel (or any other material), although it may appear so. The melting point is the temperature, at which the general integrity of material bulk shape disintegrates. Never the less, the disintegration starts well below this temperature of shape disintegration. The annealing process shows quite clearly this fact.
The break up of valence bonds is the cause for radiation of light from non-transparent material surfaces. The open valence bonds in the surface of the material break up and reestablish again. The down right same phenomenon can be observed on the surface of the sun, when some of the magnetic arches among the sunspots do not collapse back into the sun surface but split apart and exit sun surface. The large scale photons from these break ups of magnetic field arches on the sun travel space at their magnitude, adding the charged particulate of not aether, but of proton and other nuclear particulate, and occasionally cause large-scale disruptions in our electrical and electronic networks. The same happens in the surfaces of materials on a much smaller scale.
The over all lengths of valence bond quark segments and their relative energy (amplitude) decide when the bond radiates and it is individual to every element and its molecular clustering at its momentary temperature. The states of individual valence bonds at break up decide the spectral frequency of photons radiated by the particular element combination of the material structure.
Every single bit of matter, lets say a tungsten filament in a light bulb, is itself in a chaotic thermal state of motion. The nucleuses and crystals within the tungsten wire oscillate and resonate. The overall length of valence bonds changes accordingly, depending on the momentary distance between any two clusters of nucleuses and any two nucleuses within a crystal of the material. There are more or less two kinds of photons radiated from the material. The first kind of photons is generated while inter-crystalline (or inter-cluster) valence bonds break up. The second kind of photons is generated while valence bonds break up within individual crystals, eventually causing the break up of larger crystals into smaller crystals with increased temperature.
A tungsten wire can’t and does not radiate any synchronized waves of light. It radiates, quite incoherently, “wavelets” of light, the photons. Each broken valence bond quark pair in the filament adds its aetheral material to the fabric of space individually. A tungsten filament can be roughly compared to an array of hundred radio towers, where each ten towers transmits the same program (that is ten programs total), but none of the
tower transmissions are synchronized. Then your radio will receive only noise from such an array, the white light.
The valence bonds freely reestablish themselves during the hot state of the filament, but especially upon cooling, absorbing the material of the aether form the gravitational field, absorbing the aether flows. When the temperature of material is kept steady, some bonds still break up and some are established, but not necessarily exactly in the same locations. Any material ages and the aging is caused by the thermal oscillation, which does not always allow new bonds to reestablish in the place of the broken bonds.
Each individual radiation from each valence bond break up harmonizes the local portion of the fabric of space. It harmonizes a length-limited segment of those ambient electric paths, which are approximately parallel to the broken half quark, which is radial to the surface. This creates a magnetic trunk on the streamers of electric paths. This linear magnetic segment splits apart into its North and South magnetic harmonic and direction and each of these two polarities begins to travel in an opposite direction along the same set of electric paths. Photons are magnetically polarized and I was wrong in the past and it is to be seen what bearing it has on optical polarization of light by polarizers, if any.
This bit of a magnetic path is strung onto otherwise incompatible, disharmonic electric paths and travels along the electric paths with locally parallel orientation as “photon”. If you could take a still photograph of a photon, it would look like a trunk of a lightning, with streamers of aetheral paths of communication at its crown, as well as its roots. It joins the streamers in front of it and separates the streamers behind it.
Each photon travels a portion of the preexisting “chaos” of electric paths (the streamers) of the universal mesh. Since all these paths have their general curvatures leading from somewhere to somewhere else, each individual photon follows the locally prevalent curvature of space of locally parallel paths, i.e. refracts (bends). The effect of bending of light has nothing in common with the effect of weight of material objects, except for the existence of the ambient field. The mechanics of gravity, the gravitational mass of matter, has quite different causality (another chapter).
Photons have no inertial mass, because their wave pattern at any time is not in relative motion to the universal mesh wave pattern. It’s pattern is not accelerated relative to the flow motion of the aether particulate. On the other hand, photon has a momentum, because it is a magnetic segment of the ambient "electric" field traveling through space in one direction containing particulate of matter. Yet, one has to distinguish between the speed of that particulate and the speed of the magnetic unification segment traveling along the electric paths. They are not necessarily the same.
Photon “impact” on material produces effect of attraction, or repulsion, depending on whether it is absorbed, or entering and exiting a transparent medium, or reflected). It exerts impact if reflected and if absorbed by a valence bond. It is, for all the practical purposes, a traveling object, whose wave speed relative to its motion is C, whose wave pattern speed is static relative to the mesh.
On the other hand, the quark waves of a rocket material again tend to remain static relative to the mesh pattern in any direction. Their aetheral flows become accelerated along their circular path while their flow wave is accelerated relative to their bulk. But, this acceleration cannot progress along a single direction, as is the case with the wave of a flag, because the quark structure is looped. The wave and flow speed changes within the quark network have to find new relationships while conforming to the straight motion within the universal mesh. This causes the effect of inertia. On the other hand, when a formerly accelerated (relative to the mesh) object is decelerated, it again has to find new relationships of flow speeds along its loopy structure and it resists.
The acceleration as well as decceleration causes thermal interferences within the material and internal distortions with material and causes heat up and electric polarization of the object. The inherent resistance of object to motion through the mesh causes the same even when that motion is steady.
It is not true that once a material body is set in motion that it will remain in motion forever unless acted upon in the sense of Newton by some external force of some other body. It is being acted upon all the time by the internal resistance of quark loop aether speeds to conform to unidirectional wave (of the path pattern) motion relative to its bulk.
As a photon travels, it can’t stick to the same ambient electric paths of communication through out its journey, because there are no sets of path, which would be parallel along their whole length. All the ambient paths have their curvatures and permeate at all sorts of angles, while the impetus of the photon tends to preserve its vector of motion. The photon transfers along the network, incorporating new electric paths into its magnetic structure and dropping off old ones, while traveling along the ambient field. It progressively looses its capacity to locally unify the electric paths of higher frequencies.
This is more or less a question of entropy. The photon magnetic segment tenses the strings of electric paths at each pick up of a new path and at each release of an old one. The photon plucks the gravitational field component paths like guitar strings and it costs the photon in energy, while the paths pass the disturbance to their ends. Photon looses progressively its capacity to incorporate and harmonize and synchronize the shorter wavelength electric paths, while it gains capacity to incorporate lower harmonic paths, itself becoming longer (redder) and increasing its amplitude. A traveling photon transfers its energy to all the electric paths it has ever incorporated into its structure on its journey.
When any particular path may be on the verge of being blue-shifted (a quantum leap to a shorter wavelength), to change its energetic state, the photon added energy will shift it. This costs the photon energy and eventually again causes its own red shift, its aging. The combination of the presently incorporated electric paths wavelengths decide the photon
magnetic wavelength. To assume that universe is expanding based on the red shift of starlight is illogical. It is based on the assumption that photon does not age. Any assumption has nothing in common with logical process and is equivalent to daydreaming. Doppler effect is not the only mechanism, by which the incoming starlight red shifts.
The very fact that starlight can be Doppler-shifted points out that there is a medium in space, which is responsible for the speed of photons. Photon is not equivalent to a path of magnetic communication of a permanent magnet or a DC conductor magnetic field, because it lacks continuity. Magnetic field paths are structurally closer to electrons, or better said to quark pairs. They are the same stuff having different order of sizes and different relative density and geometry. Photons do not possess electric polarity, because they are not particles with looped quark structure.
The decreased speed of photon in a transparent medium like glass is caused by decreased density of the space universal mesh within glass. Glass, same as any other matter, utilizes to a degree some path of communication of the gravitational field. These become missing from among the quark structures of a material and the density and therefore tension of the universal mesh within the glass body is lower than outside the body. The lower mesh tension means slower speed of a photon.
Photons have no magnetic polarity in the sense of a magnetic field either, because they are only a little bit of what constitutes a magnetic path of communication, never mind a magnetic field, but they possess magnetic polarity in the sense of a magnetic monopole radiation.
The electric current induced in a photon detector is a result of interaction between the detector material and the photons. The electric polarity in the detector circuitry comes from the material and material combinations of the detector sensor and circuitry. Some materials give you positive charge when disturbed by friction and some give you negative charge. Some give you no charge at all and only heat up. The orientation, or polarity of charge is material dependent (in this case). The same goes for materials when disturbed by photon impacts, when the photons are absorbed. The detectors accept all the photons, the S and N as well. They get the noise. As much as rubbing direction in frictional induction of electric charge has no bearing on electric polarity of the rubbed objects, photon absorption has no direct bearing on electric polarity in the detector. The electric polarity of the el. current in the detector is due to the detector material electric preference of direction.
When material absorbs a photon, it may pass that energy as thermal, or el. current, or create a new valence bond. The absorption spectrum is different from the radiation spectrum for exactly this reason. If the particular locality of a material where the photon strikes has a momentarily asymmetric state of its potential quark and anti-quark valence bond, it may produce polarized charge within material or it may create the bond, depending on the polarity and energy of the photon.
Once we manage to filter off one magnetic polarity of the white light noise, the light may cause fairly pronounced magnetization of any ferromagnetic and paramagnetic material. It can even cause such effects as restructuring of thin blades made from ferromagnetic materials. If you do not believe me, place a freshly sharpened steel razor blade onto a tree stump into moon light and try to shave with it in the morning. You are up for a surprise.
Although light is a sort of wave phenomenon, its photons having a helical pattern, it is a standing wave phenomenon. It is a magnetic effect of locally harmonic unification, which travels along the electric fabric of space. Photons of light do not travel as waves through space and it is wrong to call them even “wavelets”. Photons travel as something, which has no name as far as I know. It is neither a progression of material in space, nor a progression of a wave in space. Its speed is supported by the tension in the mesh and therefore it is equal to C, as variable as C is with the variable density of the applicable structure of the fabric of space (read some Bruce Cathie if you want to learn some mathematical dependencies of the density of gravitational field and the speed of light). Photon has neither transverse nor longitudinal shape of its wave. Its wave shape is a helical composite, a vortex.
.

The Third Wave
.
The standard radio broadcast is generated by alternate re-polarization of the electric potential of an antenna. This alternately constricts and releases that part of the ambient spectrum of the universal mesh paths, which possess close harmonic relationship of spatial wavelengths to the spatial wavelengths of the generated alternating and polarized electric field. The shape and length of the transmitting antenna decides the shape and the general direction of such disturbance and the efficiency of the transmission. It directly affects only a small portion of the ambient field.
This disturbance travels as a general longitudinal wave with transverse effects on the electric paths and is fairly quickly dissipated by interference, or what could be called drag within the mesh, exerted by the by the rest of the mesh and by the transverse interference. See WAVE 2 Its spreading and the shape of its spreading is analogous to the waves created on a surface of a pond and even more so to sound waves and their behavior.
This wave is neither electric, nor magnetic. It is down right mechanical. When this disturbance passes by another antenna, whose length is harmonic to the speed of electric current oscillation within it (tuned), this disturbance will repeatedly induce and oscillate el. current and alternating electric potential in the antenna (and its associated circuitry) and the radio circuitry will receive the transmission as an induced alternating electric current. The process is in principle very similar to induction of electric charge by rubbing.
The standard radio transmission is a real traveling longitudinal temporal wave generated in the fabric of space. But even this wave is a subject to the local prevalence of the orientation of individual “chaotic” electric paths of communication, of the aetheral flows. This mechanical wave tends again to follow the prevalent geometry of compatible individual paths of universal mesh. Its speed is sustained by the local tension in the fabric of space, therefore is equal to that of light, C.
.

The Fourth Wave
.
This one is rather similar to the Third one, but has its substantial difference, which stands it apart. We have to go to Nicola Tesla’s Colorado experimenting and his unfinished Wardenclyffe Tower. N. Tesla used a pulse of the magnetic phenomenon called electric current to charge his copper sphere at the top of the tower. He has converted this magnetic phenomenon into its electric components at the sphere, into the alternating charge of that sphere. In essence, he has created an oscillating polarity capacitance in the sphere using the ground for the other oscillating pole.
He had regularly pulsed the sphere with high energy DC and allowed the natural oscillation in the circuit to produce the alternating induction in the area. His timing of the pulsing coincided with the natural oscillation of polarity reversals in his circuit. He would not pulse the sphere at the axis of the AC sinusoid (more like a “spikeoid”), but at the crest of the wave, at the moment of polarity reversal.
Note: It is a bad superstition that whatever is below the sinusoid axis of AC is negative and that whatever is above the axis is positive, whichever “authority” has ever come up with such a nonsense. The peaks of the sinusoid represent the reversal of polarity. The sinusoid is not about graphics with some irrelevant axis, but about the direction of polarity of AC in either governed AC in standard power lines, or natural spiky AC of circuit resonance. In analogy, a swing with a kid on it reverses the direction of its motion at the peaks of the swing, not at its bottom. The direction of the swing motion is equivalent to electric polarity reversal. The electric sinusoid axis splits the displayed AC wave into geometric halves, but not into functional halves of polarity and the positive and negative harmonics of electric current flow direction reversals.
N. Tesla has built his electric system so, that its frequency would be in a resonant ratio of the whole earth field. He would pulse let’s say every second, or third or fourth peak of the natural earth field oscillation in the correct polarity and current direction. He would pulse his sphere and allow it to naturally reverse polarity and oscillate into reversal, then pulse it again while its resonance changed the direction of polarity again. He would rock the only 100% elastic structure there is, the gravitational field. His induction would alternately pull the ambient field toward his sphere (and even more importantly toward the entire earth) and release it, harmonically repeating the cycle.
The momentary polarity at the induction peak is unimportant. Whether there is a positive charge on the sphere at the moment, or the negative charge, they both constrict the ambient field toward the sphere (and the earth). When the polarity becomes neutral, at the moment of is reversal, the artificial tension in the ambient field is released and the field springs back and overshoots its expansion. The use of a sphere has guarantied that the effect was spatially rather symmetric, i.e. globular, contrary to any standard radio transmission. It also prevented secondary oscillations of electric current within the spherical antenna itself. His wave generated in the ambient net was again neither electric, nor magnetic, but purely mechanical.
It was again a sort of longitudinal waving, supported by the tension in the net, but without the transverse effect. Beats me what its top speed would be, because it is an accelerating and deccellerating wave and therefore is not equal to a constant C during its cycles. Its speed of spread through the universe, though, would be again C.
N. Tesla has used the resonant frequency of earth gravitational field and the wave would not really spread along earthy, the whole earth would become the transmitter. It is different from the spread of waves along the surface of a pond along the surface of the earth. The simplest analogy I can present here is a wave generated with a toilet plunger in a bucket of water, the bucket serving as a resonant cavity. When you fill the bucket half full with water and start to plunge the water up and down in the center, you can feel out the natural frequency of the water oscillation in the bucket. Then you need very little energy to preserve the oscillation of the water in the bucket and even a slight increase in your effort will splash the water over the brim. If you do not plunge the water in its natural frequency, you will expend much more energy generating the waves and you will get counterproductive wave interferences within the bucket, hampering your effort.
Nicola Tesla could have powered the world with electricity with relatively a minimum of expended energy, but the question is for how long. I am personally rather glad that Mr. Morgan had pulled the rug from under him with his Wardenclyffe, even though Mr. Morgan has done it for all the wrong reasons. Tesla may have destroyed us all. He was quite aware that he could do tremendous damage to the whole earth. He had even bragged at the time that he could split it in half. I guess he might have difficulties achieving that with the Wardenclyffe, but he could have caused major tectonic upheavals and quite possibly tear the earth from its orbit. I would not put it past him that he would have done anything to satisfy his insatiable curiosity, just to see what happens when and what it looks like.
.

The Fifth Wave
.
The fifth wave is a rather recent development to the general public. It concerns the E-bomb technology as presented in a recent issue of Popular Science. This wave is transmitted when a conventional explosion breaks up a coil under high DC pulse with its existing magnetic field. The field has no opportunity to collapse back into the coil (torn to shreds by the explosion) and resonate, eventually tapering off. The individual magnetic paths of communication of this rather high-density magnetic field around the coil are literary torn off the coil material and their circular geometry is split apart.
Its North and South magnetic path components split as well and travel as strings of magnetically polarized photons, i.e. multiple thread helical wave segments, which add aether particulate to the ambient field. They would look like long coil springs again, but springs whose wavelength distances are either all positive, or all negative harmonics. The North coil magnetic segment travels in one direction, the South segment in the opposite direction.
The effect is equivalent to a break up of an emitted electron and an emitted positron and called annihilation of matter and antimater. It is also equivalent to splitting of the circular quark pair loops of material.
The orientation of the E bomb and its related magnetic field decides to a great degree the direction of the magnetic polarity induction in the targeted objects. Contrary to the standard random N-S polarity and vectors of photon radiation by “hot” objects, the field of the coil has toroidal shape before the rupture and unified direction of the N and S polarities along the axis of the coil core. This gives generally two directional radiation of high magnitude photons from the bomb.
This gismo is, technically speaking, a single pulse generator of magnetic monopole. The polarized N and S segments of magnetic field travel towards whatever target and draw (induce) their opposite polarity segments from the material of the target, giving rise to el. currents as well as electric potential polarity in the target material as long as it is conductive to any degree.
Its speed is again supported by the local tension in the universal mesh and is therefore equal to the local C. It again is not a temporal wave phenomenon, although it definitely incites mechanical temporal waves, directly in the ambient magnetic fields and indirectly in the universal mesh, the gravitational field.
Needless to say, the disruption of the coil and the field can be probably achieved by other means than an explosion. It can be achieved by randomly segmenting the coil by fast switches. If these switches were disengaged all at once just about instantly at the peak current value of the current pulse (it may be quite a headache to technically achieve, I have no clue) the explosion of the coil may become unnecessary and the “bomb” could be constructed and used as a cyclic transmitter.
If so, a cyclic transmitter like that will induce relatively high value DC in any conductors, in the same general direction through out the whole circuitry system, including conductive organic systems. That means also you and me and whoever and whatever animal. It will induce in water and in the earth. It is not a weapon, which would affect strictly electric and electronic man made systems and you can draw your own conclusions about its possible applications and effects. It would incapacitate and/or kill not only any electronics, but also any somewhat larger living organisms, overwhelming their internal electric communication polarity directions and intensities within their systems, be it wires, or nerves and muscles. The real lightning actually develops sometime visible reciprocating system of streamers at its base and can serve as a large-scale observable process of the induction of the opposite polarity of el. current in the target material. The weapon could be construed as a directional death ray machine with the help of adequate waveguide.
The defense against such a machine is not in construing Faraday cages around the target.
Faraday cage dissipates the temporal waves (3-4) in the mesh and drains its energy by transforming it into the induced el. current drained into the earth. It does not prevent passage of light in any form, be it visible light or any other, including E-bomb and sun protuberance photons.
One possible way of defense is to construe suitable waveguides around a possible target, which would guide the transmission around it.
Second such defense would be a standard magnetic field, which is actually one such guide, but I do not dare to estimate what density and magnitude of such field would be needed to achieve an effective shielding against a particular magnitude and harmonics of and such a weapon. DC current magnetic field is rather multi-frequency field. If you don’t believe me about the magnetic field serving as a waveguide, read some on northern lights and why and when they are produced and on relationship of northern lights and the solar wind.
Third kind of defense, and quite an effective one, would be a Meisner field shield. That one will reflect the E-bomb transmission, but I again do not dare to estimate what strength would be required for what E-bomb. We are talking variables here in any case.
But the development of the E-bomb draws a question of what may be the secondary, or may be even primary purpose behind the building of the huge, super-conductive and super-expensive atom smashers and why are they built deep underground under an excuse of non interference of cosmic particles with the "legitimate" research. The sufficient underground depth would protect them against conventional explosions, even nuclear ones, while their super-conductive field would protect its particle beams from any cosmic rays even above ground. The very nature of Meisner field is to restrain particles from crossing it.


PROTON
.
I think that I have finally crunched the structure of a proton and neutron on Sunday, March 26, 2000. Here is a description of what comes out of it.
Take a ping pong ball and draw a tetrahedron on it in a black pen. Join every three neighboring intersections with a circle. Two of them in red and two of them in blue. This should give you four black edges (lines) straddled by red and blue lines, one black edge straddled by 2 red and one black edge straddled by 2 blue. What you are looking at is so far a gross diagram of quark structure of a basic "nucleon", where black represents quark pair axis around which the red quark and the blue anti quark are drawn. The red-black-blue represents neutral quark pairs. The red-black-red represent double positive quark pair and the blue-black-blue represents double negative anti quark pair.
The red blue are further twisted like a twine into a double helix vortex, while the double blue and the double red are single helixes next to each other. The quarks are actually 1/3s of a photon loop and they are a magnetic order and portion of material structure. The spin number represents the portion or compound of photon loops. The photons are crests of a multistrand helical wave closed upon itself into a circle. 1/3 spin represents 1/3 of a photon loop.


El. force field of each quark looks like magnetic field of a conductor under DC, but their deformities due to the geometric arrangement of the "blue&red" quark shapes the el. fields into more or less spherical shape. The el. force fields are the communicative medium between quark pairs as well as between photon loops, balancing their momentary disparities induced by thermal energy oscillation of quarks between their points of limitation at their mutual intersections. The el. force fields are the thinner portion of the denser magnetic of quark strings. Each blue-red communicates across and around their black axis, but the red-black-red (double positive) and blue-black-blue (double negative) communication field has to half circumnavigate the "ball" and also pass through the ball, in order to communicate closing the loops. Therefore, this el. force field creates an envelope around the rest of the nucleon structurally similar to the magnetic field of earth as represented by the lines of force. Therefore, the field is more or less a doughnut like structure around and through the "nucleon" and a vortex again.
This geometrical arrangement actually represents proton, or better said electrically strongly active bipolar nucleon. It has general electrical polarity, and it has magnetic momentum due to the blue-red helix symmetry (handedness). That one decides its orientation in a general magnetic field.
When two such nucleons are brought into proximity, they will flip if needed and attach by their double negative to double positive el. force poles, because that is the strongest attractive el. force field arrangement. But, the system becomes electrically weaker to the outside as a whole compared to a single tetrahedral nucleon, as the el. force field becomes partially tied (shifted) toward the joint, which can be seen as the new center of the system. This very shift also deforms the tetrahedrons into a half of octahedron (pyramid). When the magnetic quarks also permeate, which I am not sure the el. field will cause on its own, but most likely it does, you may realize that the double positive quarks (magnetic structure) became balanced by double negatives around the now common black axis straddling quark-antiquark semicircles, that the black axis straightened and that the quark and anti quark semi circles mutually protrude into the nucleons.
The joint becomes magnetic "nodal" joint, which can be called strong force bond. This would be the second strongest and probably most common nuclear bond, as there are two quark and two anti quark pairs protruding mutually into the nucleons and at the same time tied together by the common el. force general communication field. Yet, there is a remanent electric repulsivity between the original doubles.
As double positive and double negative coupling sides of two such nucleons approach they attract the two nucleons, but also the quarks themselves the more, the closer they are. But, once the magnetic coupling progresses beyond the point of contact of the magnetic nodes of quarks and anti quarks, the situation reverses and the quark to quark el. force begins to oppose the magnetic coupling, although itself still in an attractive mode, and we have the weak force.
There is probably also a mixed quark coupling in more complex structures of nucleuses, where red-blue joins with blue-red, when the double N&P quarks are already occupied. This would balance into a cross, therefore this bond should be as strong magnetically as the first one, but really opposed by the quark to quark el. force communication. But, it should be fairly uncommon in simple nucleuses, because the doubles P&P and N&N attract much more strongly before coupling than the mixed quark pairs.
There is also a possibility of a particle structured as a 4 sided pyramid, composed from 5 photon rings, which would have no double positive and double negative pairs. But then we would have 8-quark-antiquark pair nucleon with electric momentum, but not a real single axis polarity. This stands for neutron. (S.D.K. 21.04.2001. This is wrong. See TTF2 - NEUTRON.)
As a nuclear cluster grows, it becomes electrically weaker and weaker, as the el. force general field shifts (concentrates) more and more toward the common center of the cluster. This explains why fission works on heavy elements, while fusion works on light elements. This is one of the causes of nuclear stability and instability. It also explains radioactivity and its half times. Radioactivity is caused by geometrical asymmetry of the cluster bonding due to its geometric possibilities and impossibilities, therefore instability of the nucleus in larger structures where bonding cannot be achieved where quark pairs do not match. Wave fluctuations and resonance(s) through out the bulk of material is an important factor to be taken into consideration. The smaller the material cluster, the more stable it is not only as a nuclear structure, but also as a "stone".
When a nucleon leaves any nuclear cluster within the bulk, the whole bulk becomes electrically stronger within. The geometry also explains why fission needs slow neutrons. The fast ones do not have enough contact time with a target nucleus for that nucleus to realign and shift el. force energies of the immediate el. force field structure. But when that time is allowed, the center of the cluster shifts and other parts of the target nucleus suffer imbalance and the whole cluster may split apart. Fission is not a direct result of kinetic energy breaking the target, although the impact and its resonance(s) help to destabilize the el. force relations of the quark-antiquark field communication of the target nucleus as well as the magnetic portion. The magnetic and the electric are an integral one with a great degree of flexibility (time delay).
Open and closed valence bonds are what turns the protons and possibly neutrons either into fairly electrically neutral particles, or into ions. That depends on closed and open valence bonds, (again quark photonic structures) but it is quite another part of the phenomenon called massive matter.
Counting photons per "neutron" as many people attempt does not lead anywhere. The simple reason is, that one photon will happily absorb another photon becoming one photon with the combined energy of the two original ones (this is valid only for photons tied into massive material structure.) It is very similar to a valence bond (currently misnomered as electron) absorbing a photon, without that bond becoming two bonds. The valence quantum jump is no jump in an orbit radius, but in the frequency of a complete valence bond. Actually the nuclear quark in an atom does not absorb and radiate photons directly, only a valence bond can do that. Temperature as measured by a thermometer belongs to valence bond only. Temperature of a nucleus is incomparably higher than that in its adjoining valence bonds. (This, when elaborated upon, explains thermal resistivity and the relation of tension and current when frequencial harmonics of arrays are considered.)
The 1/2 spin of electron as a valence bond spells that the valence bond itself is a photon (spin1) loop, and that valence "electron" is a half of a photon loop, i.e. 1/2 spin quark Electrons as such do not exist in material matter. They are strictly emitted particles, same as positrons. The particle identification as so far understood by orthodoxy is incorrect. The ionic electron or positron are partially tied into the nuclear structure and that part which is tied can be perceived as a part of the nucleus with its quark and anti quark loops sticking out of the nucleus open to chemical photon bonding.
Notes
  • I have a suspicion that if a model of the proton were to be built form copper (quark) and aluminum (anti quark) wires, we would probably get an ultimate orgone collector creating its own antigravity field, as long as its helixes and their frequencies were done according to the rules of harmonics, i.e. correct math relations. QM quark frequency numbers would be most likely the best guidance. The coils of the quark pairs would be more like caduceous coils in their structuring than strictly helical ones.
  • This write-up has been published twice as a discussion subject on Deja, but I have updated it trying to make it more understandable at each posting, including this version. So far no one has commented upon it.

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario